|
A Newsletter of the Real Estate Law Committees
of the Association of the Bar of the City Of New York
Proposed
New UCC Article 9 Must Address NY Coop Lending
by Matthew J. Leeds, © 19991
Several professional organizations, including
the Association of the Bar of the City of New York and the New York
State Bar Association, are currently formulating their views on the
proposed adoption in New York of revised Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial
Code.2
Without quarreling with the general notion
of uniform state laws, particularly for matters that often pertain
to interstate commerce, it must be remembered that historically New
York practice has spawned special statutory provisions. With respect
to Article 9, highly significant among these are the 1988 Amendments
to Article 93 with respect to the
creation and perfection of certain liens on the stock and proprietary
lease allocated to a cooperative apartment.4
Simply put, these special provisions have
been the basis for lending on cooperative apartments for eleven years.
It is critical that these provisions not be ignored by drafters of
the revised New York version of Article 9. It is not hyperbole to say
that these fundamental provisions regarding loans on cooperative apartments
affect more than one million people who own or live in cooperative
apartments in New York, probably billions of dollars of loans, every
bank or other lender which holds cooperative apartment loans, and all
others who hold interests as creditors or owners, including all of
the cooperative apartment corporations themselves.
It is submitted that in any sensible approach,
the drafters must take these provisions into account. However, there
are a number of ways in which to do that. Presumably, approaches could
include:
- Carrying the existing provisions directly
over into the new statute;
- Moving the provisions to another statute
where it might be felt that they are more appropriate and less likely
to cause frustration in the event of other revisions of uniform laws;
- Attempting to improve the existing provisions
(while being very careful not to disrupt the then current operation
of the provisions that might be changed); or
- Including appropriate provisions in an
even more comprehensive statute dealing with cooperative apartments.
(That is, this review of the provisions regarding liens on cooperative
apartments might give rise to an appropriate opportunity to reconsider
broader questions such as concerns about the filing system, priority
and the like.)
It might also be sensible to take into account
the effects of other laws, in particular Article 8 of the Uniform Commercial
Code which has been the subject of some discussion in the legal community,
as to such issues as that of the "issuer's lien," which some
practitioners have argued is the source of an apartment corporation's
lien against the shares of a tenant-shareholder to secure maintenance
charges and other obligations of the tenant-shareholder to the apartment
corporation.5
Of course, any approach must begin with
an understanding of the fundamentals of the following current fundamental
provisions:
UCC Section 9-304 (7)6
Generally, this section provides for the
perfection of a security interest in shares of a cooperative apartment
corporation and the appurtenant proprietary leasehold by the filing
of a Uniform Commercial Code financing statement, as otherwise required
by the statute. (Normally, a security interest in stock would be perfected
by possession.) This notion (instituted in 1988, as stated above) accomplished
at least three things which were not present under previous law:
- It regularized cooperative lending, creating
some certainty by the requirement of a filing in a public record
which can be searched;
- It created a mechanism for second loans
with respect to cooperative apartments, so the statute created the
possibility of home equity loans on cooperative apartments. (That
is, if possession were the way to perfect a security interest, only
one lender could be secured.)
- The statute requires the filing to identify
the real estate owned by the apartment corporation. This paved the
way for cross-references against the property rather than limiting
searches to the names of owners. Although this has not been a universal
practice, it is available to some extent in locations such as with
the Register of the City of New York where it is theoretically possible
to search for financing statements against the stock allocated to
an apartment, even with respect to owners prior to the owner whose
name is being searched.
UCC Section 9-401(1)(b)7
This section requires the financing statement
to be filed in the same office as a mortgage would be filed on the
real estate in which the cooperative apartment is located. Again, this
can help to provide certainty and more efficient documentation and
searchable records for liens.
UCC Section 9-403(9)8
As opposed to the normal rule of a financing
statement having a life of only five years, unless renewed, this section
states that financing statements with respect to cooperative apartment
loans are effective until a termination statement is filed.
Whatever solution to the issues raised above
is adopted, the necessary input from the Bar will, doubtless, ensure
that the appropriate provisions co-exist with what-ever are deemed
other appropriate provisions in the new proposed revised Article 9.
Endnotes
1 Matthew
J. Leeds is a partner in Robinson Silverman Pearce Aronsohn & Berman
LLP. Among other bar association, lecturing and writing activities,
he is Co-Chair of the New York State Bar Association Real Property
Section Condominiums and Cooperatives Committee.
2 E.g.,
McLaughlin and Cohen, "Preparing Now for Revised Article 9," New
York Law Journal, February 17, 1999; Association of the Bar of the
City of New York Program "Y2001: Are You Ready for New Article
9?," May-June, 1999.
3 New
York Session Laws of 1988, Chapter 333, Sections 2 and 3.
4 See,
generally, Miller, Chair, "Liens on Individual Cooperative Apartments," a
Report of the Liens Subcommittee of the Committee on Condominiums and
Cooperatives of the New York State Bar Association Real Property Law
Section, First Revision, June 6, 1997; Leeds, Chair, "Non-Judicial
Foreclosures on Cooperative Apartments," Practising Law Institute,
1992.
5 See,
e.g., ALH Properties Ten Inc. v. 306-100th Street Owners Corp., 86
N.Y.2d 643, 635 N.Y.S.2d 161 (1995).
6 N.Y.U.C.C. § 9-304(7)
(McKinney, 1999):
Notwithstanding the provisions of Section
9-305 of this code, or any provision of this section to the contrary,
a security interest in shares or other ownership interests evidenced
by stock certificates or other instruments, and a leasehold evidenced
by a proprietary lease or either of the foregoing from a corporation
or partnership formed for the purpose of cooperative ownership of real
property, or in such stock certificates alone can be perfected only
by filing in accordance with paragraph (b) of subsection one of Section
9-401 of this code. Such filing must identify the real estate or house
or building owned by such corporation or partnership with a description
sufficient for its identification.
7 N.Y.U.C.C. § 9-401(1)
(b) (McKinney, 1990):
(1) The proper place to file in order to
perfect a security interest is as follows: . . .
(b) . . . when the collateral is an ownership
interest evidenced by certificates of stock or other instruments, and
a leasehold evidenced by a proprietary lease, or either of the foregoing,
from a corporation or partnership formed for the purpose of cooperative
ownership of real estate, then in the office where a mortgage on the
real estate concerned would be filed, recorded or registered, viz.,
in the office of the recording officer in the county where the real
estate or house or building owned by such corporation or partnership
is located; . . .
8 N.Y.U.C.C. § 9-403(9)
(McKinney, 1999):
(9) When a financing statement covers shares
of [sic] other ownership interests evidenced by stock certificates
or other instruments, and a leasehold evidenced by a proprietary lease,
or either of the foregoing, from a corporation or partnership formed
for the purpose of cooperative ownership of real property and the filed
financing statement so states, it is effective until a termination
statement is filed.
|