 |
|
|
   |
Scott, Dred. Historical And Legal Examination Of
That Part Of The Decision Of The Supreme Court Of The United
States In The Dred Scott Case. New York D. Appleton & Co.
1858.
In 1854, Dred Scott, his wife and two children were held
as slaves in Missouri, the property of John Sanford. Scott
brought suit in federal court for his freedom. The first
question was whether or not plaintiff had the right to
sue. Scott had been purchased as a slave upon arrival here,
but his owner had emancipated him. Judge Taney stated the
word citizen referred to in the Constitution does not include
Negroes brought here as slaves from Africa; distinguishing
between African Negroes and American Indians. Plaintiff
may acquire all rights of citizenship within a particular
state by the laws of that state, but that does not mean
he is a citizen of the United States. The ruling of court
was that Scott was not a "citizen" and therefore
had no standing in court to sue for his freedom. Benton's
critique, written when he was dying of cancer, "is
the longest and most elaborate attack on Chief Justice
Taney's decision in the Dred Scott case written before
the Civil War." (Finkelman, Slavery in the Courtroom:
An Annotated Bibliography. Minnesota State Law Library:
Trial Collection Bibliography, part 7)
|
|
Harper’s Ferry Raid. Rise and progress of
the bloody outbreak at Harper's Ferry ... [New York]: Published
by direction of the New York Democratic Vigilant Association.
John F. Trow, printer, ... [1859]
The Harper's Ferry Raid has been described as the act
that lit the fuse on the start of the American Civil War.
By the mid 1800’s, those who wanted to abolish slavery
were divided into two camps: one believing in moral suasion,
and one called "Free Soilers" wishing to end
slavery by legal means. As the mid century approached and
slavery seemed as strong as ever, a new type of abolitionist,
born of frustration, emerged willing to use violent means
to end slavery. John Brown was one of these. Brown spent
three years collecting money from wealthy abolitionists
in order to establish a colony for runaway slaves. To accomplish
this, Brown needed weapons and decided to capture the arsenal
at Harpers Ferry. Brown expected local slaves to rise up
against their owners and join the raid. Not only did this
fail to happen, but townspeople began shooting at the raiders.
A jury found him guilty of treason against the Commonwealth
of Virginia. Judge Richard Parker sentenced Brown to death
and he was hanged. Before walking to the scaffold, he noted
the inevitability of a national civil war: "I, John
Brown, am now quite certain that the crimes of this guilty
land will never be purged away but with blood." (West
Virginia Archives,
John Brown and the Harpers Ferry Raid)
|
|
Kennedy, Lionel H. and Thomas Parker. An Official
Report of The Trials of Sundry Negroes, Charged with an Attempt
to Raise an Insurrection in the State of South Carolina …Charleston,
N.C.: James R. Schenck, 1822.
Colonial and early national newspapers contain some actual
accounts of slave insurrections, of small-scale slave uprisings,
and many rumors about them. This report details plans for
an unsuccessful 1822 slave rebellion led by Denmark Vesey,
a free black man, around Charleston, South Carolina. Foiled
in their efforts by slave informers, about thirty-five
African- Americans were captured and hanged. However, the
report states that "enough has been disclosed to satisfy
every reasonable mind, that considerable numbers were involved." One
informer noted that Vesey told a meeting of the rebel group
they would seize the guard house and magazine to get arms.
Then they would "rise up and fight against the whites
for our liberties." (Library of Congress, The African
American Odyssey: A Quest for Full Citizenship)
|
|
Burns, Anthony. Boston Slave Riot, Trial of Anthony
Burns .... Boston: Fetridge and Company, 1854.
Before 1854, most Northerners managed to ignore the distant
unpleasantness of slavery. But that year an escaped Virginia
slave, Anthony Burns, was captured and brought to trial
in Boston. The trial revolutionized the moral and political
climate in Massachusetts and sent shock waves through the
nation. After being in Massachusetts for some time he was
served a warrant for his arrest and return to his former
master. The master contested Burns still owed him time
and service and he wanted it. Burns was subsequently placed
under arrest and afforded the right for a trial. Burns
objected and the case went to the United States Court.
On Friday evening of the next night an assembly was held
in Boston's Faneuil Hall. The goal of this assembly was
to stand up against the wrong doings of these slave hunters
and deliver justice to Burns. The South lay claim that
the north had no right to take their property (a slave).
The South insisted that Burns be returned at once without
question. (Dictionary of American Biography)
|
|
Amistad Slavery Case. The African
captives: Trial of the prisoners of the Amistad on the writ
of habeas corpus, before the Circuit Court of the United
States, for the District of Connecticut at Hartford: Judges
Thompson and Judson. September term, 1839 New York: Published and for sale at 143 Nassau
Street, 1839
I am resolved it is better to die than
to be a white man’s
slave…
Joseph Cinque, leader of the revolt of African slaves aboard
the Spanish ship, Amistad, 1839
Led by Sengbe Pieh, better known as Joseph Cinque, a group
of African slaves aboard the Spanish ship Amistad had killed
the captain and crew of the vessel and were attempting
to sail back to Africa. They were sighted off the eastern
tip of Long Island by Lt. Commander Thomas Gedney on board
the brig Washington who seized the Amistad and towed it
to New London, Connecticut where he notified U. S. Marshals.
The Africans were consigned to county jail in New Haven.
Abolitionists, led by New Yorkers Simeon S. Jocelyn, a
white pastor of a black church, Joshua Leavitt, editor
of the Emancipator, the official organ of the anti-slavery
society, and wealthy merchant Lewis Tappan, formed an Amistad
Committee to raise money for their defense, find an interpreter
and provide for their physical well being. Initially, the
case was brought before the Circuit Court of the United
States for the District of Connecticut, at Hartford which
denied habeas corpus due to lack of jurisdiction. The case
of the Amistad prisoners ultimately reached the Supreme
Court where they were defended by Roger S. Baldwin and
former U. S. President John Quincy Adams. The Supreme Court
decision did not attack slavery, but found that Cinques
and his followers had been illegally kidnapped from Africa
and, therefore were not liable for crimes committed against
their captors. After having been in custody for two years,
the Africans were released and, with the help of the Amistad
Committee, returned to the Colony of Sierra Leone accompanied
by five missionaries.
|
|
The Lemmon Slave Case.
New York Court of Appeals Report of the The
Lemmon Slave Case: Containing points and Arguments
of Counsel on Both Sides and Opinions of all the Judges.
New
York: Horace Greeley, 1860
The Lemmon case had national significance because it pitted the laws of a free state against those of a slave state. In 1852, the Lemmon family of Virginia traveled with their eight slaves to New York en route to catching a steamer to Texas. It was not their intention to remain in the state any longer than necessary. However, a free Negro named Louis Napoleon observed them and filed a writ of habeas corpus in New York City's Superior Court seeking to free the Lemmon's slaves. New York's "nine month transit law," during which time the status of slaves traveling through was unaffected, had been repealed in 1841. The lower court granted the writ and the Lemmons, reimbursed by insurance, returned to Virginia. Several years later, the State of Virginia challenged the actions of the State of New York and appealed to the state's highest court. The court decided 5-3 in favor of New York in a pro-freedom decision that sustained the slaves' release.
|
|
The Trial of Amos Broad and his wife .
The Trial of Amos Broad and his wife, on three
several indictments for assaulting and beating Betty
a slave, and her little female child, Sarah, aged three
years. Had at the Court of Special Sessions of the
Peace, held in and for the city and county of New-York,
at the City-hall, of the said city, on Tuesday, the
28 th day of February, 1809…
Printed by Henry C. Southwick, No.2 Wall-Street, 1809.
Amos Broad and his wife Demis were indicted for cruel and unusually harsh beating of two of their slaves. Some of the testimony included eyewitness accounts of Mr. Broad pouring water on Betty and making her stand out in the cold until it froze on her. Another witness testified that Mrs. Broad "kicked the infant (Sarah) in the breasts until she gasped
for breath." At summation, the defense attorney proposed that Amos and his wife should voluntarily free Betty, Sarah and a third slave, Hannah. Broad was found guilty on both counts of assault and was sentenced to a total of sixty days in prison and a $500 fine. His wife was also found guilty and fined $250, but because of her pregnancy was not jailed. The court did not address the legality of slavery since the institution was not completely outlawed in New York until 1827. However, the outcome of the case is notable because it led to unexpected freedom for the three slaves.
|
|
Trial and Imprisonment of Jonathan Walker. 1844
Trial and Imprisonment of Jonathan Walker, at Pensacola
Florida, for Aiding Slaves to Escape from Bondage. With an Appendix, Containing
a Sketch of His Life. Boston: Published at the Anti-Slaver, 1845
Then lift that manly right-hand, bold
Ploughman of the wave!
Its branded palm shall prophesy, "Salvation
To the Slave!"
The Branded Hand by John Greenleaf Whittier
Jonathan Walker was a Florida resident who moved to Massachusetts to separate himself from the institution of slavery. He returned to Florida three years later and attempted to help seven slaves, formerly in his employ, to escape. He was captured and tried in the Superior Court of Escambia County, in the District of West Florida, Territory of Florida. On being convicted, he was pilloried, pelted with rotten eggs, imprisoned for eleven months, fined, and branded on the hand branded by a U. S. Marshal with the letters "S.S." which stood for "slave stealer." This episode was the inspiration for John Greenleaf Whittier's abolitionist poem, The Branded Hand. |
|
Nutt, Lizzie. Lizzie Nutt's sad experience :
A heart broken, and a family plunged in grief. Wreck and
ruin! The shooting and tragic death of noble-hearted Captain
Nutt, Lizzie's brave father, who flinched not, like a true
soldier, to die in defence of his daughter's honor. The
great Dukes trial at Uniontown, Pa. Full account, and all "those
terrible letters." Philadelphia : Barclay & Co.,
1883.
Nutt, James. The Very Pathetic and Truly remarkable
Trial of Young James Nutt, the avenger of his father’s
death... Philadelphia: Barclay & Co. [1884]
Nicholas L. Dukes, an attorney, was engaged to marry
Lizzie Nutt. Dukes wrote anonymous letters to Lizzie’s
father, Captain A.C. Nutt, saying that his daughter,
Lizzie, was intimate with several young men. He also
placed letters near the Nutt residence about her supposed
scandalous conduct. Captain Nutt demanded that Dukes
marry his daughter immediately. A few days later Dukes
and Nutt met at the Jennings Hotel. A scuffle broke out
and Dukes shot Lizzie’s father, allegedly in self
-defense. Dukes surrendered immediately fearing that
he would be lynched by the townspeople. Duke’s
defense was that he killed Nutt fearing that he would
be shot. Everyone thought that Dukes would certainly
be convicted, but the jury, which included many of Nutt’s
friends, acquitted Duke. The judge could not conceal
his amazement, admonishing the jury as he dismissed the
prisoner. Duke was subsequently disbarred and after winning
a seat in the Pennsylvania House of Representatives,
resigned, rather than being expelled after the slanderous
assault on Lizzie Nutt’s character was found to
be false. James Nutt, Lizzie’s brother, was so
enraged he stalked, shot and killed Dukes. James was
acquitted by reason of insanity. (McDade, The Annals
of Murder, A Bibliography 718, New York Times.)
|
|
Pomeroy, Jesse Harding. The life of Jesse Harding
Pomeroy the most remarkable case in the history of crime
or criminal law / by E. Luscomb Haskell. Boston : [s.n.],
1892.
In 1871 and 1872, then age 12, Pomeroy beat and tortured
small children and left them for dead in the alleyways
of South Boston. Caught, he was sent to reform school
but was later released into his mother’s care.
In March, 1874, Pomeroy killed a ten year old girl named
Katie Curren and one month later he took Horace Mullin
to a marshland outside of the city and slashed him viciously
with a knife until he died. When he was picked up by
police he was carrying a bloodstained knife, had mud
from the marsh where Horace Mullin was found on his trousers
and was wearing shoes that had the same sole print as
ones taken from the crime scene. The body of Katie Curren
was soon found in the basement of Jesse’s mother’s
apartment. Newspaper editorials declared that a post
Civil war America was in the midst of a “crime
epidemic” and blamed violent entertainment, especially
the dime novels, “Wild Bill Hickock” and “Indian
Dan.” Pomeroy was sentenced to be hanged, but because
of his youth the sentence was commuted to solitary imprisonment
for life. Pomeroy died 58 years later, at the age of
73, on a prison farm after spending most of his adult
life with only a small ceiling window for light. (Purohit,
Jesse Harding Pomeroy: The Teenaged Killer, Schechter,
Fiend: The Shocking Truth of Americas Youngest Serial
Killer, New York Times)
|
|
Wirz, Henry The Demon of Andersonville; or the
Trial of Wirz. Philadelphia: Barclay & Co.,1865.
Wirz, a native of Switzerland, was tried and executed
in the fall of 1865 for war crimes committed against
the Union POW's in the Andersonville prison camp. The
courts claimed that Wirz was involved in a conspiracy
with Jefferson Davis to torture and murder the Union
inmates. The pro Confederate author claims that the accusations
were untrue and that the trial was a mockery of justice.
Henry Wirz rejected an offer of a pardon the night before
his execution. The offer was conditioned on his agreement
to testify that former Confederate President Jefferson
Davis was responsible for the deaths at Andersonville.
Wirz advised that such a statement would be untrue and
he would not base his freedom on a lie. With the execution
of Henry Wirz the desire for vengeance felt in the North
apparently died. No additional "conspirators" were
tried or even indicted. Henry Wirz became the only person
ever to be executed in the United States for war crimes.
Henry Wirz's trial set the precedent for future war crimes
trials and was cited in the war crimes trials following
both World War I and World War II. "I was simply
following orders" was no longer acceptable as a
defense when "crimes against humanity" were
committed by soldiers. The Wirz trial clearly provided
that there are limitations to the extent military orders,
which violate the rules of war or common law of humanity,
may be followed. It established that military personnel
may be held personally accountable for following such
orders.(Bill Carnes and Troy Drew, The Trial of Captain
Henry Wirz, Commandant Andersonville Prison)
|
|
Murel, John A.
A history of the detection, conviction, life and designs of John A. Murel, the
great western land pirate : together with his system of villany, and plan of
exciting a Negro rebellion ; Also, a catalogue of the names of four hundred and
fifty-five of his mystic clan, fellows and followers, and their efforts for the
destruction of Mr. Virgil A. Stewart, the young man who detected him, to which
is added a biographical sketch of V.A. Stewart , by Augustus Q. Walton. Cincinnati:
circa 1850.
One of the most famous of American outlaw narratives. Murrell (correct spelling)
appeared in court several times in 1825-6 for gaming and horse stealing. He soon
developed a network of thieves who committed highway robberies from New Orleans
to Tennessee. Murrell's "clan" operated throughout the old Southwest
and their specialty became slave stealing. A slave would be enticed from captivity
by offers of freedom and once secured, he would be sold and stolen repeatedly
until the slave became so well known through wanted posters that he could no
longer be sold; he would then be murdered. Murrell was turned in by Virgil Stewart,
a member of the gang, and tried in Jackson, Tennessee, in 1835. The most sensational
aspect of Stewart's testimony was that Murrell and his cohorts had planned a
great slave rebellion in the Southwest. In fact, there were several outbreaks
in the summer of 1835 and some of the instigators confessed to belonging to the
Murrell gang. More than 20 were hung before quiet was restored. This work was
taken from the papers of Virgil Stewart. (Howes, U.S. IANA (1650-1950). A Selective
Bibliography in Which Are Described 11,620 W76. Sabin, A Dictionary of Books
Relating to America 101209. Chapel Hill Books. William Reese Company)
. |
|
back to top |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|